[rt-users] Thoughts to ponder

[Jesse Vincent]

Well, there already is http://fsck.com/pub/rt/contrib, which anyone is welcome to send
me files to be included in. I only ask that you package your add-on as a tar file with
a readme included both inside and outside the tarball. 

Additionally, if you're interested in enhancing the online documentation, perhaps
with FAQ entries on common modifications, I'd recommend that you join the 
rt-doc-workers mailinglist and post your proposed new FAQ entries. Significant
contributers to rt-doc-workers can even get a username and password to
update the online documentation directly ;)

	-j


On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 09:27:50PM -0600, Johan Edstrom wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> I'd like to get your input on trying to compile
> a repository of add-ons as well as "nifty" stuff found on
> the rt-users list. Having used RT for a while and done quite a few
> modifications I can see that there is a big demand for all of the
> nice add-ons made - like the great Stats package  or all of Bruces's
> mods
> but - also following the lists, most people don't seem to want to
> base64 decode the mailing lists, and the same requests come up
> over and over again.
> 
> I think we'd benefit from something like the Netsaint add-ons or
> the BigBrother add-on pages or even something Freshmeat similar?
> 
> Being a very big fan of  FreeBSD - I propose a BSD similar model -
> everything
> that goes in (As opposed to a linux model) will be "tried and verified"
> - For untried patches I would not mind adding a "Try it yourself area?"
> 
> I think I can get space and some BW from my employer, and I was
> thinking maybe a simple Slash like system to get everything uploaded and
> somewhat documented?
> 
> Or should it just simply all be put on sourceforge?
> 
> 
> /JE
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> 

-- 
http://www.bestpractical.com/products/rt  -- Trouble Ticketing. Free.