[rt-users] RT 3.0 install problem with Apache::Request on RedHat 7.3

[shimi]

my httpd.conf is quite... the original that came from rh7.3, just with 
loadmodule for php4. that's not it. 

this will be a shot in the dark (because I remember doing something like 
that), but try:

perl -MCPAN -e 'install mod_perl'

hmm...

On 1 Apr 2003, Curtis Rempel wrote:

> On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 08:54, shimi wrote:
>     arrr... ok, try answering yes to the question, or, if at all possible, 
>     just type ! <return> where it asks for /sbin/...httpd... i remember 
>     messing with these, and eventually it worked, and the platform as the same 
>     as yours....
>     
> 
> 
> If I answer 'yes', then I get the output from the original posting.
> 
> If I answer 'no', then I get the output below.
> 
> If I answer ! to skip, I get:
> 
> [...]
> 
> Running make test
> make[1]: Entering directory `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/c'
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/c'
> make[1]: Entering directory `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/Request'
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/Request'
> make[1]: Entering directory `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/Cookie'
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/Cookie'
> t/httpd -f `pwd`/t/httpd.conf
> /bin/sh: t/httpd: No such file or directory
> make: *** [start_httpd] Error 127
>   /usr/bin/make test -- NOT OK
> Running make install
>   make test had returned bad status, won't install without force
> [root at vault rt-3-0-0]#
> 
> And this makes sense as it cannot find my httpd.  
> 
> It does correctly locate /usr/sbin/httpd when it prompts me for an httpd
> to use:
> 
> For testing purposes, please give the full path to an httpd
> with mod_perl enabled.  The path defaults to $ENV{APACHE}, if present.
>  [/usr/sbin/httpd] ('!' to skip):
> 
> However, the next question is whether I want to search for dependencies
> doesn't seem to matter if I choose y or n:
> 
> Search existing config file for dynamic module dependencies? [y]:
> 
> I get either the original error (choosing n) or the one below about
> TypesConfig (choosing y)
> 
> Perhaps you could send me your httpd.conf and I could compare?  I wonder
> if that's where the problem lies?
> 
> Curtis
> 
> 
> 
>     On 1 Apr 2003, Curtis Rempel wrote:
>     
>     > On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 03:17, shimi wrote:
>     >     that happend to me too
>     >     
>     >     just install it manually...
>     >     
>     >     i.e. perl -MCPAN -e 'install Apache::Request'
>     >     
>     >     and when it asks wether to inspect the current config file, say NO
>     >     
>     >     - shimi
>     >     
>     > 
>     > Hi Shimi,
>     > 
>     > Thanks for the tip.  I did that and now I get a different error:
>     > 
>     > unning make test
>     > make[1]: Entering directory `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/c'
>     > make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/c'
>     > make[1]: Entering directory `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/Request'
>     > make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/Request'
>     > make[1]: Entering directory `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/Cookie'
>     > make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/Cookie'
>     > t/httpd -f `pwd`/t/httpd.conf
>     > Syntax error on line 15 of /root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/t/httpd.conf:
>     > Invalid command 'TypesConfig', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a
>     > module not included in the server configuration
>     > make: *** [start_httpd] Error 1
>     >   /usr/bin/make test -- NOT OK
>     > Running make install
>     >   make test had returned bad status, won't install without force
>     > [root at vault rt-3-0-0]#
>     > 
>     > 
>     > Curtis
>     > 
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > rt-users mailing list
>     > rt-users at lists.fsck.com
>     > http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>     > 
>     > Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at http://fsck.com/rtfm
>     > 
>     
>     -- 
>     
>       Best regards,
>          Shimi
>     
>     
>     ----
>     
>        "Outlook is a massive flaming horrid blatant security violation, which
>         also happens to be a mail reader."
>     
>        "Sure UNIX is user friendly; it's just picky about who its friends are."
>     
>     
>     
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> 
> Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at http://fsck.com/rtfm
> 

-- 

  Best regards,
     Shimi


----

   "Outlook is a massive flaming horrid blatant security violation, which
    also happens to be a mail reader."

   "Sure UNIX is user friendly; it's just picky about who its friends are."