[rt-users] RT 3.0 install problem with Apache::Request on RedHat 7.3

James L. Harrison harrison at palisadesys.com
Tue Apr 1 11:54:03 EST 2003


I am having the same problem right now....

I think I got it to work by running the install for libapreq by hand... Not
through cpan:
 	  CGI ...found
        Apache::Request ...found
        Apache::DBI ...found

But... Now when I go to do a make initialize-database I get the following:
Password: Now creating a database for RT.
Creating mysql database rt3.
Now populating database schema.
Creating database schema.
schema sucessfully inserted
Now inserting database ACLs
Now inserting RT core system objects
Checking for existing system user...not found.  This appears to be a new
installation.
Creating system user...Can't locate object method "begin_work" via package
"DBI::db" (perhaps you forgot to load "DBI::db"?) at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/DBIx/SearchBuilder/Handle.pm line 497,
<SCHEMA> line 416.
make: *** [initialize-database] Error 255

Any ideas?

-Jamie


> -----Original Message-----
> From: rt-users-admin at lists.fsck.com
> [mailto:rt-users-admin at lists.fsck.com]On Behalf Of shimi
> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 10:21 AM
> To: Curtis Rempel
> Cc: rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> Subject: Re: [rt-users] RT 3.0 install problem with Apache::Request on
> RedHat 7.3
>
>
>
> my httpd.conf is quite... the original that came from rh7.3, just with
> loadmodule for php4. that's not it.
>
> this will be a shot in the dark (because I remember doing something like
> that), but try:
>
> perl -MCPAN -e 'install mod_perl'
>
> hmm...
>
> On 1 Apr 2003, Curtis Rempel wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 08:54, shimi wrote:
> >     arrr... ok, try answering yes to the question, or, if at
> all possible,
> >     just type ! <return> where it asks for /sbin/...httpd... i remember
> >     messing with these, and eventually it worked, and the
> platform as the same
> >     as yours....
> >
> >
> >
> > If I answer 'yes', then I get the output from the original posting.
> >
> > If I answer 'no', then I get the output below.
> >
> > If I answer ! to skip, I get:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Running make test
> > make[1]: Entering directory `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/c'
> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/c'
> > make[1]: Entering directory `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/Request'
> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/Request'
> > make[1]: Entering directory `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/Cookie'
> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/Cookie'
> > t/httpd -f `pwd`/t/httpd.conf
> > /bin/sh: t/httpd: No such file or directory
> > make: *** [start_httpd] Error 127
> >   /usr/bin/make test -- NOT OK
> > Running make install
> >   make test had returned bad status, won't install without force
> > [root at vault rt-3-0-0]#
> >
> > And this makes sense as it cannot find my httpd.
> >
> > It does correctly locate /usr/sbin/httpd when it prompts me for an httpd
> > to use:
> >
> > For testing purposes, please give the full path to an httpd
> > with mod_perl enabled.  The path defaults to $ENV{APACHE}, if present.
> >  [/usr/sbin/httpd] ('!' to skip):
> >
> > However, the next question is whether I want to search for dependencies
> > doesn't seem to matter if I choose y or n:
> >
> > Search existing config file for dynamic module dependencies? [y]:
> >
> > I get either the original error (choosing n) or the one below about
> > TypesConfig (choosing y)
> >
> > Perhaps you could send me your httpd.conf and I could compare?  I wonder
> > if that's where the problem lies?
> >
> > Curtis
> >
> >
> >
> >     On 1 Apr 2003, Curtis Rempel wrote:
> >
> >     > On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 03:17, shimi wrote:
> >     >     that happend to me too
> >     >
> >     >     just install it manually...
> >     >
> >     >     i.e. perl -MCPAN -e 'install Apache::Request'
> >     >
> >     >     and when it asks wether to inspect the current config
> file, say NO
> >     >
> >     >     - shimi
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > Hi Shimi,
> >     >
> >     > Thanks for the tip.  I did that and now I get a different error:
> >     >
> >     > unning make test
> >     > make[1]: Entering directory `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/c'
> >     > make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/c'
> >     > make[1]: Entering directory
> `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/Request'
> >     > make[1]: Leaving directory
> `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/Request'
> >     > make[1]: Entering directory
> `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/Cookie'
> >     > make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/Cookie'
> >     > t/httpd -f `pwd`/t/httpd.conf
> >     > Syntax error on line 15 of
> /root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/t/httpd.conf:
> >     > Invalid command 'TypesConfig', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a
> >     > module not included in the server configuration
> >     > make: *** [start_httpd] Error 1
> >     >   /usr/bin/make test -- NOT OK
> >     > Running make install
> >     >   make test had returned bad status, won't install without force
> >     > [root at vault rt-3-0-0]#
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > Curtis
> >     >
> >     > _______________________________________________
> >     > rt-users mailing list
> >     > rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> >     > http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> >     >
> >     > Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at
http://fsck.com/rtfm
>     >
>
>     --
>
>       Best regards,
>          Shimi
>
>
>     ----
>
>        "Outlook is a massive flaming horrid blatant security violation,
which
>         also happens to be a mail reader."
>
>        "Sure UNIX is user friendly; it's just picky about who its friends
are."
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at http://fsck.com/rtfm
>

--

  Best regards,
     Shimi


----

   "Outlook is a massive flaming horrid blatant security violation, which
    also happens to be a mail reader."

   "Sure UNIX is user friendly; it's just picky about who its friends are."

_______________________________________________
rt-users mailing list
rt-users at lists.fsck.com
http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at http://fsck.com/rtfm




More information about the rt-users mailing list