[rt-users] RT 3.0 install problem with Apache::Request on RedHat 7.3

shimi shimi at shimi.net
Tue Apr 1 11:52:36 EST 2003 

that's it! that's what I did! :)

and the problem now would be an perl -MCPAN -e 'install DBI' .... (notice: 
not Apache::DBI, but just DBI)

(I have a feeling RedHat did something "the redhat way" over here

On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, James L. Harrison wrote:

> I am having the same problem right now....
> 
> I think I got it to work by running the install for libapreq by hand... Not
> through cpan:
>  	  CGI ...found
>         Apache::Request ...found
>         Apache::DBI ...found
> 
> But... Now when I go to do a make initialize-database I get the following:
> Password: Now creating a database for RT.
> Creating mysql database rt3.
> Now populating database schema.
> Creating database schema.
> schema sucessfully inserted
> Now inserting database ACLs
> Now inserting RT core system objects
> Checking for existing system user...not found.  This appears to be a new
> installation.
> Creating system user...Can't locate object method "begin_work" via package
> "DBI::db" (perhaps you forgot to load "DBI::db"?) at
> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/DBIx/SearchBuilder/Handle.pm line 497,
> <SCHEMA> line 416.
> make: *** [initialize-database] Error 255
> 
> Any ideas?
> 
> -Jamie
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: rt-users-admin at lists.fsck.com
> > [mailto:rt-users-admin at lists.fsck.com]On Behalf Of shimi
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 10:21 AM
> > To: Curtis Rempel
> > Cc: rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> > Subject: Re: [rt-users] RT 3.0 install problem with Apache::Request on
> > RedHat 7.3
> >
> >
> >
> > my httpd.conf is quite... the original that came from rh7.3, just with
> > loadmodule for php4. that's not it.
> >
> > this will be a shot in the dark (because I remember doing something like
> > that), but try:
> >
> > perl -MCPAN -e 'install mod_perl'
> >
> > hmm...
> >
> > On 1 Apr 2003, Curtis Rempel wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 08:54, shimi wrote:
> > >     arrr... ok, try answering yes to the question, or, if at
> > all possible,
> > >     just type ! <return> where it asks for /sbin/...httpd... i remember
> > >     messing with these, and eventually it worked, and the
> > platform as the same
> > >     as yours....
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > If I answer 'yes', then I get the output from the original posting.
> > >
> > > If I answer 'no', then I get the output below.
> > >
> > > If I answer ! to skip, I get:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > Running make test
> > > make[1]: Entering directory `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/c'
> > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/c'
> > > make[1]: Entering directory `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/Request'
> > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/Request'
> > > make[1]: Entering directory `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/Cookie'
> > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/Cookie'
> > > t/httpd -f `pwd`/t/httpd.conf
> > > /bin/sh: t/httpd: No such file or directory
> > > make: *** [start_httpd] Error 127
> > >   /usr/bin/make test -- NOT OK
> > > Running make install
> > >   make test had returned bad status, won't install without force
> > > [root at vault rt-3-0-0]#
> > >
> > > And this makes sense as it cannot find my httpd.
> > >
> > > It does correctly locate /usr/sbin/httpd when it prompts me for an httpd
> > > to use:
> > >
> > > For testing purposes, please give the full path to an httpd
> > > with mod_perl enabled.  The path defaults to $ENV{APACHE}, if present.
> > >  [/usr/sbin/httpd] ('!' to skip):
> > >
> > > However, the next question is whether I want to search for dependencies
> > > doesn't seem to matter if I choose y or n:
> > >
> > > Search existing config file for dynamic module dependencies? [y]:
> > >
> > > I get either the original error (choosing n) or the one below about
> > > TypesConfig (choosing y)
> > >
> > > Perhaps you could send me your httpd.conf and I could compare?  I wonder
> > > if that's where the problem lies?
> > >
> > > Curtis
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >     On 1 Apr 2003, Curtis Rempel wrote:
> > >
> > >     > On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 03:17, shimi wrote:
> > >     >     that happend to me too
> > >     >
> > >     >     just install it manually...
> > >     >
> > >     >     i.e. perl -MCPAN -e 'install Apache::Request'
> > >     >
> > >     >     and when it asks wether to inspect the current config
> > file, say NO
> > >     >
> > >     >     - shimi
> > >     >
> > >     >
> > >     > Hi Shimi,
> > >     >
> > >     > Thanks for the tip.  I did that and now I get a different error:
> > >     >
> > >     > unning make test
> > >     > make[1]: Entering directory `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/c'
> > >     > make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/c'
> > >     > make[1]: Entering directory
> > `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/Request'
> > >     > make[1]: Leaving directory
> > `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/Request'
> > >     > make[1]: Entering directory
> > `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/Cookie'
> > >     > make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/Cookie'
> > >     > t/httpd -f `pwd`/t/httpd.conf
> > >     > Syntax error on line 15 of
> > /root/.cpan/build/libapreq-1.1/t/httpd.conf:
> > >     > Invalid command 'TypesConfig', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a
> > >     > module not included in the server configuration
> > >     > make: *** [start_httpd] Error 1
> > >     >   /usr/bin/make test -- NOT OK
> > >     > Running make install
> > >     >   make test had returned bad status, won't install without force
> > >     > [root at vault rt-3-0-0]#
> > >     >
> > >     >
> > >     > Curtis
> > >     >
> > >     > _______________________________________________
> > >     > rt-users mailing list
> > >     > rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> > >     > http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> > >     >
> > >     > Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at
> http://fsck.com/rtfm
> >     >
> >
> >     --
> >
> >       Best regards,
> >          Shimi
> >
> >
> >     ----
> >
> >        "Outlook is a massive flaming horrid blatant security violation,
> which
> >         also happens to be a mail reader."
> >
> >        "Sure UNIX is user friendly; it's just picky about who its friends
> are."
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rt-users mailing list
> > rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> > http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> >
> > Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at http://fsck.com/rtfm
> >
> 
> --
> 
>   Best regards,
>      Shimi
> 
> 
> ----
> 
>    "Outlook is a massive flaming horrid blatant security violation, which
>     also happens to be a mail reader."
> 
>    "Sure UNIX is user friendly; it's just picky about who its friends are."
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> 
> Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at http://fsck.com/rtfm
> 

-- 

  Best regards,
     Shimi


----

   "Outlook is a massive flaming horrid blatant security violation, which
    also happens to be a mail reader."

   "Sure UNIX is user friendly; it's just picky about who its friends are."

More information about the rt-users mailing list