[rt-users] Newbie: applying hv.c patch to redhat 9 rpms
michael-i at myrealbox.com
michael-i at myrealbox.com
Wed Sep 3 13:26:00 EDT 2003
I just joined the list today, beacuse I'm trying to solve this problem,
based on responses that applying the hv.c patch works. I don't have
a lot of experience with patch files, so I going to assume I am doing
something wrong.
Trying to rpmbuild -ba perl.spec throws:
Patch #32002 (perl-5.8.0-storable.patch):
+ patch -p1 -s
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file hv.c.rej
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.23516 (%prep)
Here's what I did:
I installed all the redhat perl SRPMS.
Make a file in /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/perl-5.8.0-storable.patch (see end of msg for
my patchfile. i adjusted the paths by looking at the pagerfix.patch)
Changed SPECS/perl.spec to include
Patch32002: perl-5.8.0-storable.patch
%patch32002 -p1
then ran rpmbuild -ba perl.spec.
-- ams
--- perl-5.8.0/hv.c~ Sat Aug 9 23:43:53 2003
+++ perl-5.8.0/hv.c Sun Aug 10 00:25:09 2003
@@ -308,6 +308,8 @@ S_hv_fetch_flags(pTHX_ HV *hv, const cha
}
else
HeKFLAGS(entry) =3D flags;
+ if (flags)
+ HvHASKFLAGS_on(hv);
}
if (flags & HVhek_FREEKEY)
Safefree(key);
@@ -478,6 +480,8 @@ Perl_hv_fetch_ent(pTHX_ HV *hv, SV *keys
}
else
HeKFLAGS(entry) =3D flags;
+ if (flags)
+ HvHASKFLAGS_on(hv);
}
if (key !=3D keysave)
Safefree(key);
----------------
here's the hv.c.rej file:
***************
*** 308,313 ****
}
else
HeKFLAGS(entry) =3D flags;
}
if (flags & HVhek_FREEKEY)
Safefree(key);
--- 308,315 ----
}
else
HeKFLAGS(entry) =3D flags;
+ if (flags)
+ HvHASKFLAGS_on(hv);
}
if (flags & HVhek_FREEKEY)
Safefree(key);
***************
*** 478,483 ****
}
else
HeKFLAGS(entry) =3D flags;
}
if (key !=3D keysave)
Safefree(key);
--- 480,487 ----
}
else
HeKFLAGS(entry) =3D flags;
+ if (flags)
+ HvHASKFLAGS_on(hv);
}
if (key !=3D keysave)
Safefree(key);
-------------------------------------
[from the rt3 on redhat thread]
> i confirme, i have rebuild the RPMS of perl on a
> redhat 9, after i have aplied the patch. and now i
>have no more probleme with the storable
>>le 26 Aug, Nathan Affleck a écrit :
>> I applied the hv.c patch to the redhat-9-perl-5.8.0 rpm source, rebuilt
> it, and it's running smoothly. I think that's the only real solution,
> unless Storable.pm gets "patched" for the perl bug, or you wait until
> 5.8.1 ?? Does this problem only occur on 5.8.0 and Redhat? Why hasn't
> anyone else been complaining about other systems with 5.8.0?
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-
8&threadm=057001c35155%242f5622b0%249a06000a%40VinnyPavillion&rnum=10&p
rev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-
8%26q%3Dstorable.pm%2B5.8.0
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/attachments/20030903/87940d51/attachment.htm>
More information about the rt-users
mailing list