[rt-users] RT2: OnCorrespondence AutoResolve?
John Gedeon
jgedeon at qualcomm.com
Fri Sep 12 12:15:49 EDT 2003
rt-2 can support email commands. So you could apply that patch to your mail
gate and then your email only support people can type
'rt-status: resolved' at the top of their email an it will automatically
set the status to resolved when the email is received and correspondence is
sent.
The patch I used as an example is at
<http://www.fsck.com/pub/rt/contrib/2.0/rt-addons/> look at
enhanced-mailgate and enhanced-mailgate.README by Jesse
HTH
John
At 06:16 AM 9/12/2003, Scott A. McIntyre wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Part of our rt-2 user community (yes yes, we're trying to migrate to rt3
>soon) would like to have their queue setup in such a way that any
>correspondence/replies they generate to a ticket will reset the ticket
>status to 'resolved'.
>
>They do not have any OnResolve conditions, and they don't use the command
>line or web interface much; their use is limited to email and will only
>use the interface to specifically query for tickets on an as-needed basis
>for historical archive purposes only.
>
>I tried modifying the OpenTicket contribution to perform essentially the
>same action, but I fear that there's a precedence problem I can't get
>around. There are three scrip actions for the queue:
>
>OnCreate NotifyAllWatchers with template Transaction
>OnCorrespond NotifyAllWatchers with template Correspondence
>OnCorrespond ResolveTicket with template Blank
>
>The order of these doesn't seem to matter on behaviour.
>
>What happens however is:
>
>Fri Sep 12 15:04:37 2003 Ticket created
>Fri Sep 12 15:05:57 2003 RT_System - Status changed from resolved to open
>Fri Sep 12 15:05:57 2003 RT_System - Status changed from new to resolved
>Fri Sep 12 15:05:57 2003 scott - Correspondence added
>
>The first entry was the Create, which did the right thing. The third
>entry was the resolve-on-correspondence, but then the correspondence went
>out, which changed the status from resolved to open again. The log
>entries all have the same timestamp, as can be seen.
>
>Is there a solution for this short of modifying RT not to have the "open
>ticket on correspondence" behaviour for one queue only (which probably
>will be a bit of a headache to implement).
>
>Thanks for any thoughts,
>
>Scott
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>rt-users mailing list
>rt-users at lists.fsck.com
>http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
>Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at http://fsck.com/rtfm
--
<>< Proverbs 3:5-6 "Trust in the Lord with all your heart and lean not on
your own understanding;
in all your ways acknowledge him, and he
will make your paths straight."
More information about the rt-users
mailing list