[rt-users] httpd speed on rt3
Alex Soares de Moura
alex at rnp.br
Wed Jan 21 13:40:10 EST 2004
The mytop tool myabe can be of some help too:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/databases/mytop/pkg-descr
----- Original Message -----
From: "AJ" <rt at musefoundry.com>
To: "'Palle Girgensohn'" <girgen at pingpong.net>; "'Mike Frazer'"
<Michael.Frazer at InterCept.Net>; "'Douglas E. Warner'"
<dwarner at ctinetworks.com>; <rt-users at lists.fsck.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 4:31 PM
Subject: RE: [rt-users] httpd speed on rt3
> Have you enabled ExtendedStatus in apache and taken a peek at what it is
> doing?
>
> Also there is:
>
> <Location /perl-status>
> SetHandler perl-script
> PerlHandler Apache::Status
> PerlSetVar StatusOptionsAll On
> Order Deny,Allow
> Deny from All
> Allow from <your ip>
> </Location>
>
> That will show you the Perl config, Memory, Loaded Modules, the stack,
etc..
>
> Out of curiosity, as well as CPU, how does the load average and per
process
> memory consumption on the box look? Top can give you those, and vmstat
can
> at least give you an idea if processes are getting blocked for some
reason.
> Also for linux, the following can give you memory usage for httpd:
> perl -pe 's/^(\w+)-(-w+) /hex($2) - hex($1) . " "/e' \
> > </proc/`cat <httpd.pidfile>`/maps
>
>
> I know in mysql there are sort and read buffer memory settings. If not
set
> high enough, performance can degrade.
>
> Mysql 4.0 will do query caching. Set query_cache_size in the my.cnf.
> Problem is that table updates will clear the cache and RT being a
> transactional system, the cache may never be used for ticket but may be
used
> for principal, user, and group lookups
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com
> [mailto:rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Palle
> Girgensohn
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 9:06 PM
> To: Mike Frazer; Douglas E. Warner; rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> Subject: RE: [rt-users] httpd speed on rt3
>
> I use postgresql. And, I did a check as to how much time was spent by
> postgresql handling the queries, and althogh the same question was asked
> over a hundred times, which surely is a bug, postgresql spent around 800
ms
> doing queries. The request tooks six seconds. And, perl waiting for
> postgresql hardly eats CPU, it's a network connection (or in this case
unix
> domain socket) waiting for data. Most of the queries where pretty simple,
> only a few took more than a couple of milliseconds.
>
> Perl probably goes into a loop handling this same data it gets more than a
> hundred times, but it hardly eats cycles while waiting for it to come.
>
> As for MySQL, I have no experience, but isn't 4.x much more competent in
> terms of what SQL it handles, compared to 3.x? This perhaps comes with a
> price, a performance penalty? But as I said, I have no experience with
> MySQL, been using postgresql since 1995... :)
>
> Palle
>
> --On tisdag, januari 20, 2004 09.34.46 -0500 Mike Frazer
> <Michael.Frazer at InterCept.Net> wrote:
>
> > Consider that MySQL may not be optimized on the RT3 machine, and what
you
> > are seeing with Perl is actually just Perl waiting on the records to be
> > retrieved. There are quite a few joins in the SQL queries, so an
> > unoptimized database could very well be slowing things down.
> >
> > In my personal experience, as well, MySQL 3.23.xx always seemed to run
> > better for me than did 4.0.xx, regardless of what I did to improve the
> > speed. Maybe it was just me but that was my experience.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Palle Girgensohn [mailto:girgen at pingpong.net]
> > Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2004 11:15 PM
> > To: Douglas E. Warner; rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> > Subject: Re: [rt-users] httpd speed on rt3
> >
> >
> > I'm seeing similar performance problems. Pls check out the thread @
> > rt-devel from Jan 15th.
> >
> > I run fastcgi, so I see the Perl process eating CPU cycles, since you
run
> > mod_perl, you see the httpd process hogging, since that's where perl
> > runs. It's definitely perl doing some bad stuff.
> >
> > I've no idea what happens yet, but just wanted to tell you that you're
> > not alone, FWIW. :)
> >
> > Palle
> >
> > --On torsdag, januari 15, 2004 21.01.39 -0500 "Douglas E. Warner"
> > <dwarner at ctinetworks.com> wrote:
> >
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> I appologize if this has been covered in the past; please let me know
if
> >> it has.
> >>
> >> I'm running a Dual P3/1.26GHz w/ 1G of RAM on Fedora Core 1, with
Apache
> >> 1.3.29 and mod_perl 1.29 compiled in and MySQL 4.0.17 RPMs, using RT
> >> 3.0.8. Viewing tickets seems especially slow. Most tickets take 8
> >> seconds or longer to load, and one ticket in particular takes about 16
> >> seconds. On my *much* humbler box running RT2, it takes about half
that
> >> time. During this time, it doesn't appear to be MySQL that's using
CPU
> >> or disk, but httpd that's hogging up 100% of one CPU.
> >>
> >> I'd really appreciate it if anybody has any ideas on how to reduce the
> >> load time for tickets, or what I can do to track down why tickets are
> >> taking so long to display.
> >>
> >> - -Doug
> >>
> >> - --
> >> Douglas E. Warner <dwarner at ctinetworks.com> Network Engineer
> >> CTI/PAdotNET http://ctinetworks.com +1 717 975 9000
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
> >>
> >> iD8DBQFAB0YDJV36su0A0xIRAgaUAJ4oSNWnu+6/bFqpmBIIacdRsd+UfACgy4gc
> >> FQyHgaosDFe1erCgK1Uj6+s=
> >> =U52p
> >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rt-users mailing list
> >> rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
> >> http://lists.bestpractical.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> >>
> >> Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at http://fsck.com/rtfm
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rt-users mailing list
> > rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
> > http://lists.bestpractical.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> >
> > Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at http://fsck.com/rtfm
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at http://fsck.com/rtfm
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at http://fsck.com/rtfm
>
More information about the rt-users
mailing list