[rt-users] Re: FETCHM~1: MDA returned nonzero status 127
Craig Ducharme
cducharm at direct-alliance.com
Fri Nov 5 10:09:27 EST 2004
Indika,
You might want to try installing the latest release (3.0.12)
http://wiki.bestpractical.com/?WindowsOSInstallGuide.
Craig Ducharme
Direct Alliance Corporation
Configuration Management Specialist
602.790.5765 Cell
480.446.1483 Direct
cducharm at direct-alliance.com
www.direct-alliance.com
-----Original Message-----
From: rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Craig
Ducharme
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 8:04 AM
To: indika at hsenid.lk; rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: RE: [rt-users] Re: FETCHM~1: MDA returned nonzero status 127
Hi Indika,
I battled with this problem for about two days and couldn't remember the
final resolution. I did remember that I had to install Cygwin on the
server in addition the actions you've already performed (change
ownership, latest cygwin dll). I'll work on tracing my steps to resolve
the problem.
Regards,
Craig Ducharme
Direct Alliance Corporation
Configuration Management Specialist
602.790.5765 Cell
480.446.1483 Direct
cducharm at direct-alliance.com
www.direct-alliance.com
-----Original Message-----
From: rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of
indika at hsenid.lk
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 2:37 AM
To: rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: [rt-users] Re: FETCHM~1: MDA returned nonzero status 127
Hi all,
This is the complete error message I'm getting when I run rt-mailgate,
FETCHM~1: 6.2.5 querying alf.hsenid.lk (protocol POP3) at Fri Nov
04: poll started
FETCHM~1: POP3< +OK <19442.1099647287 at alf.hsenid.lk>
FETCHM~1: POP3> CAPA
FETCHM~1: POP3< -ERR authorization first
FETCHM~1: authorization first
FETCHM~1: Repoll immediately on general at alf.hsenid.lk
FETCHM~1: POP3< +OK <19443.1099647287 at alf.hsenid.lk>
FETCHM~1: POP3> USER general
FETCHM~1: POP3< +OK
FETCHM~1: POP3> PASS *
FETCHM~1: POP3< +OK
FETCHM~1: POP3> STAT
FETCHM~1: POP3< +OK 2 1626
FETCHM~1: POP3> LAST
FETCHM~1: POP3< +OK 0
2 messages for general at alf.hsenid.lk (1626 octets).
FETCHM~1: POP3> LIST 1
FETCHM~1: POP3< +OK 1 817
FETCHM~1: POP3> TOP 1 99999999
FETCHM~1: POP3< +OK
reading message general at alf.hsenid.lk:1 of 2 (817 octets)
#***FETCHM~1: MDA returned nonzero status 127
not flushed
Please help me in resolving this if you have any idea.
> Yes. I am logged in as administrator and owner of rt-mailgate.conf is
> also administrator (changed it from administrators to administrator)
but
> still no luck. :-(
>
> Regards,
> Indika.
>
> On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 04:55, Craig Ducharme wrote:
>> Indika,
>>
>> Are you logged in as Administrator when you execute rt-mailgate?
>> Ownership of rt-mailgate.conf needs to be that of the user executing
>> rt-mailgate.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Craig Ducharme
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com
>> [mailto:rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Indika
>> Wasala
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 4:10 AM
>> To: rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
>> Subject: [rt-users] FETCHM~1: MDA returned nonzero status 127
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have successfully installed rt-3.0.11.exe from
>> http://p4.elixus.org/dist/ in a Windows 2000 advanced server machine
and
>> everything works fine except fetchmail which comes with the
>> distribution.
>>
>> When I ran rt-mailgate shortcut I get the following error message
after
>> successfully login into the mail server,
>>
>> FETCHM~1: MDA returned nonzero status 127
>> not flushed
>>
>> I changed the owner of the file rt-mailgate.conf to the administrator
>> and replaced the cygwin1.dll file (in bin folder) with a latest
version
>> (1005.9.0.0 with 1005.11.0.0 - got this trick from a mailing list)
but
>> still get the above error.
>>
>> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>>
>> Be sure to check out the RT wiki at http://wiki.bestpractical.com
>>
>> The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
email by anyone else is unauthorized.
>>
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted in reliance on it, is
prohibited and may be unlawful.
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Be sure to check out the RT wiki at http://wiki.bestpractical.com
_______________________________________________
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Be sure to check out the RT wiki at http://wiki.bestpractical.com
_______________________________________________
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Be sure to check out the RT wiki at http://wiki.bestpractical.com
More information about the rt-users
mailing list