[rt-users] Installation pain...

[Ruslan U. Zakirov]

Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 05:26:41PM -0700, Jon Forrest wrote:
> 
>>Jesse Vincent wrote:
>>
>>>>The issue of which version of mod_perl to use also took a lot
>>>>of head scratching.
>>>
>>>What made this one difficult? I thought the README was pretty direct on
>>>the topic, but I'd be happy to rev it to help folks out.
>>>
>>
>>This was back maybe 6 months when the Wiki said don't use mod_perl2 but
>>there were a bunch of people using it successfully. Plus, it was hard to get
>>a clear answer on what the problems were with mod_perl2 because
>>it was changing all the time. In fact, back then it was very
>>confusing because mod_perl2 was actually using a 1.XXX version
>>number.
>>
>>I haven't tried with the official mod_perl2 release so maybe
>>things are better.
> 
> 
> Ok, this one is hard.  
> 
> :-)
> 
> 2.0rc4 is ok cause I'm running it.
> 
> At rc5 or rc6 (I don't recall which one), they renamed everything so
> that it would *not* conflict with mod_perl1, and it caused major
> namespace hell; which version of 2.0rc you need to use depends on ...
> well, I'm not sure what it depends on.  It made the list here; check
> the archives.
> 
> But rc4 works.  :-)
Should be noted that it works only for those who know what they are
doing, because FC3 has only mod_perl-1.99_16-3.i386.rpm which is out of
the date.


> 
> Cheers,
> -- jra