[rt-users] Installation pain...

[Jay R. Ashworth]

On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 05:26:41PM -0700, Jon Forrest wrote:
> Jesse Vincent wrote:
> >>The issue of which version of mod_perl to use also took a lot
> >>of head scratching.
> >
> >What made this one difficult? I thought the README was pretty direct on
> >the topic, but I'd be happy to rev it to help folks out.
> >
> This was back maybe 6 months when the Wiki said don't use mod_perl2 but
> there were a bunch of people using it successfully. Plus, it was hard to get
> a clear answer on what the problems were with mod_perl2 because
> it was changing all the time. In fact, back then it was very
> confusing because mod_perl2 was actually using a 1.XXX version
> number.
> 
> I haven't tried with the official mod_perl2 release so maybe
> things are better.

Ok, this one is hard.  

:-)

2.0rc4 is ok cause I'm running it.

At rc5 or rc6 (I don't recall which one), they renamed everything so
that it would *not* conflict with mod_perl1, and it caused major
namespace hell; which version of 2.0rc you need to use depends on ...
well, I'm not sure what it depends on.  It made the list here; check
the archives.

But rc4 works.  :-)

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                                                jra at baylink.com
Designer                          Baylink                             RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates        The Things I Think                        '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA      http://baylink.pitas.com             +1 727 647 1274

      If you can read this... thank a system administrator.  Or two.  --me