POLL: comments with status changes (was Re: [rt-users] Comment whenticket transfers queues)

[Brookes, Iris]

I vote for
 
1)	Always

Iris

-----Original Message-----
From: rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com]On Behalf Of Jay R.
Ashworth
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 12:18 PM
To: rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: POLL: comments with status changes (was Re: [rt-users] Comment
whenticket transfers queues)


On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 11:11:57AM -0500, Vicki Stanfield wrote:
> >Yes, I believe that's what she wants: she wants to force RT to prompt
> >for a comment transaction to automagically accompany the queue change
> >transaction.
> >
> >On reflection, it seems to *me* that the easiest way to accomplish
> >that, since the queue in which a ticket lives seems only to be able to
> >be changed in the GUI from Basics and Jumbo, is to further restrict it
> >only to the Jumbo screen, and modify the code which catches it to throw
> >an error on Queue changes unless the comment field has contents in it.
> >
> >I'm not enough of an RT hacker to know how practical such a change to
> >the code is, but this sort of speaks to where *I* was originally going
> >with ticket-tracking design before I found RT, which is that *every*
> >transaction automatically has fields for both private and public
> >comment, regardless of what sort of transaction it is.

> Yes, this would be an improvement IMHO. I really think it is better to 
> offer the user an opportunity to comment even if it goes unused much of 
> the time. The database size change would be minimal and the benefit 
> would be great. Our situation is that we transfer tickets back and forth 
> between queues to pass them off for the next stage of work. Sure, I can 
> go and add a comment to tell them what stage was just completed and what 
> was done by whom, but it seems to me that wanting to do so would be more 
> the rule than the exception. Is my intended usage so unusual?

Well, clearly *I* don't think so, but I do not comprise the entire set
of users of RT.

So, a poll:

================================================================
When you make status changes to a ticket (current queue, owner,
priority, etc), do you add a related comment

1)	Always
2)	Almost always
3)	Occasionally
4)	Almost never

?
================================================================

(I've unthreaded this message so no one misses it.)

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                                                jra at baylink.com
Designer                          Baylink                             RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates        The Things I Think                        '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA      http://baylink.pitas.com             +1 727 647 1274

      If you can read this... thank a system administrator.  Or two.  --me
_______________________________________________
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Be sure to check out the RT Wiki at http://wiki.bestpractical.com