[rt-users] Automatic CC owner on take
James McTavish
jmctavish at matrixorbital.ca
Thu Feb 15 14:16:10 EST 2007
We currently use RT for our sales and technical support queries. Our
sales department really doesn't like having to go through the browser
to do their correspondence, they would prefer just using email. So
I've cooked up a quick an dirty method that *should* work, if only I
could figure it out.
What I would like to happen is that when someone takes a ticket, it
adds them to the CC list and emails them the initial message. This
way all they have to use their browser for is take the ticket. I've
been going through the mailing list, and the wiki, cobbling together
something that I thought should work, but alas, it only partially
works. I'm hoping that someone can tell me what I'm doing wrong, and
at least give me a direction to go. For all I know, I'm
overcomplicating things, and there is a MUCH simpler means to
accomplish this.
My scrip so far is:
Condition: User Defined:
my $trans = $self->TransactionObj;
return 0 unless $trans->Field eq 'Owner';
return 1 if $trans->OldValue == RT::Nobody( )->id( );
return 0;
Action: User Defined:
Custom action preparation code:
my $new_id = $self->TransactionObj->NewValue;
my $new_user = RT::User->new();
$new_user->Load($new_id);
my $new_email = $new_user->EmailAddress();
$self->TicketObj->AddWatcher( Type => "Cc",
Email => $new_email);
return 1;
Custom action cleanup code:
return 1;
Template:
To: {$Ticket->OwnerObj->EmailAddress }
{$Ticket->Transactions->First->Content()}
As I've said, this only partially works. The new owner does in fact
get added as a CC, however no email is sent. I check the logs and a
few things jump out:
The scip itself generates this warning:
Feb 15 12:08:26 rt RT: at //var/www/rt/rt-3.6.3/lib/RT/Base.pm line 92
Feb 15 12:08:26 rt RT::Base::CurrentUser('RT::User=HASH
(0xf69eb14)') called at //var/www/rt/rt-3.6.3/lib/RT/Record.pm line 90
Feb 15 12:08:26 rt RT::Record::_Init('RT::User=HASH(0xf69eb14)')
called at //var/www/rt/rt-3.6.3/lib/RT/User.pm line 79
Feb 15 12:08:26 rt RT::User::_Init('RT::User=HASH(0xf69eb14)')
called at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/DBIx/SearchBuilder/
Record.pm line 362
Feb 15 12:08:26 rt DBIx::SearchBuilder::Record::new('RT::User')
called at (eval 749) line 2
Feb 15 12:08:26 rt eval ' my $last_id = $self->TransactionObj-
>NewValue;
Feb 15 12:08:26 rt my $temp_user = RT::User->new();
Feb 15 12:08:26 rt $temp_user->Load($last_id);
Feb 15 12:08:26 rt my $last_email = $temp_user->EmailAddress();
Feb 15 12:08:26 rt $self->TicketObj->AddWatcher( Type => "Cc",
Feb 15 12:08:26 rt Email => $last_email);
Feb 15 12:08:26 rt push( @{$self->{\'To\'}},
Feb 15 12:08:26 rt $self->TicketObj->QueueObj->Cc-
>MemberEmailAddresses );
Feb 15 12:08:26 rt return 1;' called at //var/www/rt/rt-3.6.3/lib/RT/
Action/UserDefined.pm line 63
Feb 15 12:08:26 rt RT::Action::UserDefined::Prepare
('RT::Action::UserDefined=HASH(0xf66cec8)') called at //var/www/rt/
rt-3.6.3/lib/RT/ScripAction_Overlay.pm line 232
Feb 15 12:08:26 rt RT::ScripAction::Prepare('RT::ScripAction=HASH
(0xf692ad0)') called at //var/www/rt/rt-3.6.3/lib/RT/Scrip_Overlay.pm
line 476
Feb 15 12:08:26 rt eval {...} called at //var/www/rt/rt-3.6.3/
lib/RT/Scrip_Overlay.pm line 470
<<<SNIP>>>>
Feb 15 12:08:26 rt RT: RT::User=HASH(0xf69eb14) was created without a
CurrentUser 1 (//var/www/rt/rt-3.6.3/lib/RT/Base.pm:92)
And finishes up with
Feb 15 12:08:26 rt RT: About to think about scrips for transaction
#458213
Feb 15 12:08:26 rt RT: About to prepare scrips for transaction #458213
Feb 15 12:08:26 rt RT: Found 2 scrips
Feb 15 12:08:26 rt RT: About to commit scrips for transaction #458213
Feb 15 12:08:26 rt RT: About to commit scrips for transaction #458212
Feb 15 12:08:26 rt RT:
<rt-3.6.3-3363-1171566506-1830.41458-2-0 at matrixorbital.ca>
#41458/458212 - Scrip 2 (//var/www/rt/rt-3.6.3/lib/RT/Action/
SendEmail.pm:243)
Feb 15 12:08:26 rt RT:
<rt-3.6.3-3363-1171566506-1830.41458-2-0 at matrixorbital.ca> No
recipients found. Not sending. (//var/www/rt/rt-3.6.3/lib/RT/Action/
SendEmail.pm:255)
Any help at all would be greatly appreciated.
--
-James
More information about the rt-users
mailing list