[rt-users] I miss the "in-reply-to" header in status change notifications

[Jesse Vincent]

>
> And this behavior definitivly changed from 3.4.1 to 3.6.{3,4}.
>

FWIW, yes. we did do a _lot_ of work on references and in-reply-to  
between 3.4.1 and 3.6. But most of it was to get _more correct_  
header info.

Looking at a random message coming off of our 3.6.3+devel instance, I  
see this:


	In-Reply-To: 	 
<58902A3242FE224383CAA8A79D6003540144D0DC at MADARRMAIL1.company.es>
	References: 	<RT-Ticket-8991 at bestpractical.com>  
<rt-3.6.HEAD-30042-1176217247-1914.8991-5-0 at bestpractical.com>  
<0D6B0D3D889E2F47977901A316A532DAE0C12D at MADARRMAIL2.company.es>  
<rt-3.6.HEAD-29928-1176217460-1101.8991-4-0 at bestpractical.com>  
<rt-3.6.HEAD-30042-1176395413-432.8991-5-0 at bestpractical.com>  
<58902A3242FE224383CAA8A79D6003540144CF14 at MADARRMAIL1.company.es>  
<rt-3.6.HEAD-30042-1176397091-440.8991-4-0 at bestpractical.com>  
<789F8407-CE9B-41D9-A538-BB9F3A3A6666 at bestpractical.com>  
<rt-3.6.HEAD-30070-1176410219-1527.8991-5-0 at bestpractical.com>  
<58902A3242FE224383CAA8A79D6003540144D0DC at MADARRMAIL1.company.es>
	Message-Id: 	 
<rt-3.6.HEAD-8936-1183532383-1227.8991-4-0 at bestpractical.com>
	Precedence: 	bulk
	X-Rt-Loop-Prevention: 	bestpractical.com

And things thread just fine.


Jesse
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/attachments/20070718/3eb5dc8b/attachment.sig>