[rt-users] I miss the "in-reply-to" header in status change notifications

[Joop]

Jesse Vincent wrote:
>>
>> And this behavior definitivly changed from 3.4.1 to 3.6.{3,4}.
>>
> 
> FWIW, yes. we did do a _lot_ of work on references and in-reply-to 
> between 3.4.1 and 3.6. But most of it was to get _more correct_ header 
> info.
> 
> Looking at a random message coming off of our 3.6.3+devel instance, I 
> see this:
> 
> 
>     In-Reply-To:     
> <58902A3242FE224383CAA8A79D6003540144D0DC at MADARRMAIL1.company.es>
>     References:     <RT-Ticket-8991 at bestpractical.com> 
> <rt-3.6.HEAD-30042-1176217247-1914.8991-5-0 at bestpractical.com> 
> <0D6B0D3D889E2F47977901A316A532DAE0C12D at MADARRMAIL2.company.es> 
> <rt-3.6.HEAD-29928-1176217460-1101.8991-4-0 at bestpractical.com> 
> <rt-3.6.HEAD-30042-1176395413-432.8991-5-0 at bestpractical.com> 
> <58902A3242FE224383CAA8A79D6003540144CF14 at MADARRMAIL1.company.es> 
> <rt-3.6.HEAD-30042-1176397091-440.8991-4-0 at bestpractical.com> 
> <789F8407-CE9B-41D9-A538-BB9F3A3A6666 at bestpractical.com> 
> <rt-3.6.HEAD-30070-1176410219-1527.8991-5-0 at bestpractical.com> 
> <58902A3242FE224383CAA8A79D6003540144D0DC at MADARRMAIL1.company.es>
>     Message-Id:     
> <rt-3.6.HEAD-8936-1183532383-1227.8991-4-0 at bestpractical.com>
>     Precedence:     bulk
>     X-Rt-Loop-Prevention:     bestpractical.com
> 
> And things thread just fine.
I just had a look at my mail file of Thunderbird and did a search for 
'In-Reply-To: <rt-3.6.1' which turned up only one hit the first email so 
I'll need to have a look at my old email archive to look back further. I 
didn't get any hits for 'In-Reply-To: <rt-3.6.2', and had a lot of hits 
for 'In-Reply-To: <rt-3.6.3', no hits yet for 'In-Reply-To: <rt-3.6.4'
May be this helps in finding when problems started.

Joop