[rt-users] New Installation

[Ruslan Zakirov]

MP 1.99.xx is not supported. you must use 2.0.x, but instead of
fighting with mod_perl you can go with FastCGI what is may be easier
in your situation.

On 6/25/07, Robert Canary <rwcanary at ocdirect.net> wrote:
> Thanks Ruslan,
>
> Sorry for the delay I was called out of the office on some trouble tickets.
>
> Here is what I put in the httpd.conf
>
> <VirtualHost *:4400>
>     ServerName mchn37.ocdirect.net
>     ServerAdmin rwcanary at ocdirect.net
>     DocumentRoot /opt/rt3/share/html
>     ErrorLog /var/log/rt/rt-web-error.log
>     CustomLog /var/log/rt/rt-web-access.log common
>     AddDefaultCharset UTF-8
>
>     PerlModule Apache::DBI
>     PerlRequire /opt/rt3/bin/webmux.pl
>
>     <Location />
>      SetHandler perl-script
>      PerlHandler RT::Mason
>     </Location>
> </VirtualHost>
>
> I do have an Apache2.pm as well as a apache.pm, I did a symlink to the
> apache.pm and but now it is complaining that the mod_perl is pre 1.99.
>
> This is a fresh RHEL 4 with all updates, it was my understanding the
> httpd *is* apache2 and has been built with mod_perl2.  At least that is
> what the docs say.
>
> thanks agian
> --
> robert
>
>
> Ruslan Zakirov wrote:
> > On 6/23/07, Robert Canary <rwcanary at ocdirect.net> wrote:
> >> I figure this to be more of a Perl Question..
> >>
> >> I have read the archives and queried for the infamous "Can't locate
> >> Apache.pm",  while I found few matches I did really find what I was
> >> looking for either.
> >>
> >> RHEL 4
> >> This RT 3.4.5
> >> Apache 2.0.52
> >> Perl 5.8.5
> >>
> >> However, if I run RT using the standalone script it works fine, which
> >> tells me it is an apache thing.
> >> Apache.pm dose exist.  However, the @INC apparently isn't picking it up.
> >>
> >> Exactly what do I need to reinstall to get this corrected?  Apache has
> >> been completely gutted and reinstalled.  What perl module am I looking
> >> for to reinstall?  All the testdeps are showing everything is there.
> > Apache.pm is part of mod_perl, you have to decide if you want mod_perl
> > or FastCGI. In the latter case you don't need Apache.pm. As you're
> > using apache2 then you need mod_perl2 too, but afaik it has Apache2.pm
> > instead, so it's not clear why anything complaining about Apache.pm.
> >
> > Could you share relevant part of apache's config?
> >
> >>
> >> Second thing is:  How do you tell the standalone script to use a
> >> different port, besides 8080?
> > ./bin/standalone_httpd 8000
> >
> >>
> >> thanks in advance
> >> --
> >> robert
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> >>
> >> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> >> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
> >>
> >>
> >> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> >> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>


-- 
Best regards, Ruslan.