[rt-users] Re: RT 4

[Asif Iqbal]

Would be nice to have PAM auth builtin or capabilities.

On 5/1/07, Philip Kime <pkime at shopzilla.com> wrote:
>
> One thing I saw mentioned was Mandatory field support - we implemented a
> pretty robust Mandatory field system in RT here with a separate checkbox
> so that validation and Mandatory are separate. Also pushed all the code
> into the core API so it works via REST, email and GUI. This has been
> submitted as patches against 3.6.3.
>
> Another thing is the ability to display (and sort by) the RealName of
> users everywhere instead of the Name field. This is crucial in (silly)
> places where the policy is to have completely numeric usernames (like
> AD/LDAP authentication where corporate policy is employee IDs as
> usernames ...). RT is really crippled if you can't tell easily by
> looking, who did what. I have patches to put in two flags to decide
> which to display, against 3.6.3. Jesse mentioned that this might already
> be in 3.7 but I installed 3.7.1 and there doesn't seem to be anything in
> there like this.
>
>
> PK
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>



-- 
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/attachments/20070501/1704849e/attachment.htm>