[rt-users] NotifyActor even prevents explicit CCs?

[Jesse Vincent]

On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 09:58:15PM +0300, Ruslan Zakirov wrote:
> On Jan 28, 2008 9:43 PM, Stephen Turner <sturner at mit.edu> wrote:
> >
> > At Friday 1/25/2008 08:31 PM, Ruslan Zakirov wrote:
> > >I think it's been there for ages and sure you're right that it's kind
> > >of odd and unexpected. Forward this  message to the bug tracker so
> > >you'll be able to track it.
> > >
> > >On Jan 23, 2008 6:41 PM, Jay Lee <jlee at pbu.edu> wrote:
> > > > We have NotifyActor set to 0 to cut down on the amount of useles
> > > messages RT
> > > > sends.  However, it seems this even prevents the actor from receiving
> > > > messages if they explictly enter themself into the CC: field on a Reply or
> > > > Comment.  Is this the desired behavior?  Would it make sense to override
> > > > NotifyActor if the address is explicitly set?
> > > >
> >
> > We have patched our RT to implement this behavior, also to have
> > explicit Cc & Bcc override the ticket squelch list. i.e. if you're on
> > a ticket's squelch list and someone puts your address as an
> > additional Cc/Bcc, you will get the email.
> >
> > If there's interest in our solution I can post our patches.
> I think we should integrate them, at least for one time recipients.
> Don't know about squelching. Jesse?
> 

+1

> >
> > Thanks,
> > Steve
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> >
> > Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> > Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
> >
> >
> > Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> > Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best regards, Ruslan.
> 

--