[rt-users] Urgent help on multi-stage approvals

Jesse Vincent jesse at bestpractical.com
Mon Jul 28 09:19:35 EDT 2008


On Jul 28, 2008, at 2:41 AM, Hong Fai Leong wrote:

> Hi Jesse,
>
> Thanks for answering my mail.
>
> Here's my workflow setup. The idea here is to use the multi-stage  
> approvals for the request which requires the manager approval before  
> redirecting it to the director for approval.
>
That basically looks right.  Which scrips fire when the ticket is  
created? When does the "notify the director" scrip fire?


> Templates:
>
> ===Create-Ticket: manager-endorsement
> Subject: Recruitment Request Endorsement::{$Tickets{'TOP'}->Subject}
> Depended-On-By: TOP
> Queue: ___Approvals
> Type: approval
> Owner: {
>     return $Tickets{'TOP'}->FirstCustomFieldValue('Approving  
> Requester/Manager Id');
> }
> Content: Manager endorsement is needed for this request.
> Please see the parent ticket for details.
> ENDOFCONTENT
>
> ===Create-Ticket: director-endorsement
> Subject: Recruitment Request Endorsement::{$Tickets{'TOP'}->Subject}
> Depends-On: manager-endorsement
> Depended-On-By: TOP
> Queue: ___Approvals
> Type: approval
> Owner: ccelhf
> Content: Director endorsement is needed for this request.
> Please see the parent ticket for details.
> ENDOFCONTENT
>
> Scrips:
>
> On Create, Create ticket with the above template.
>
>
> Hong-Fai
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Jesse Vincent <jesse at bestpractical.com 
> > wrote:
>
> On Jul 24, 2008, at 9:51 PM, Hong Fai Leong wrote:
>
>> I've followed the example in "RT Essentials" on configuring a  
>> multistage approval. It worked beautifully in v3.6.3. It fails to  
>> work after I've upgraded RT to v3.6.7.
>>
>> In 3.6.3, the second approver will only receive an email upon the  
>> first approval resolution of the approving ticket.
>>
>> In 3.6.7, both approvers will receive emails at the same time.
>>
>> Can someone confirm this behaviour? I would really like to have  
>> back the behaviour found in 3.6.3. Can anyone out there who can  
>> help me on this. This is really important in what I'm going to do  
>> in my organization. Any advice is much appreciated. Thanks.
>
> With the information you've given us so far, it's fairly hard to  
> debug. RT 3.6.3 was..quite a long time ago and we've fixed a fair  
> number of bugs. It may well be the case that one of those fixes has  
> unintended consequences.   If you can share your workflow  
> configuration with the list, someone might be able to spot something.
>
> Best,
> Jesse Vincent
> Best Practical
>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>>
>> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
>> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>>
>>
>> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
>> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/attachments/20080728/39389853/attachment.htm>


More information about the rt-users mailing list