[rt-users] FastCGI: incomplete headers (0 bytes)

[Erich Weiler]

> Try upgrade of Text::Quoted it can cause seg faults with similar symptoms.
> 
> Turn on debug logging everywhere (RT, apache, db server).

I tried updating Text::Quoted but it seems I already have the latest 
version...  One thing I did notice in the logs (/var/log/messages) was 
this when I try to create a ticket:

May 17 07:04:31 barnyard RT: 
<rt-3.6.6-25749-1211033071-977.1533-3-0 at myco.edu> #1533/14192 - Scrip 3 
  (/usr/local/rt3/lib/RT/Action/SendEmail.pm:266)
May 17 07:04:31 barnyard perl: nss_ldap: reconnecting to LDAP server 
(sleeping 4 seconds)...
May 17 07:04:36 barnyard perl: nss_ldap: reconnecting to LDAP server 
(sleeping 8 seconds)...
May 17 07:04:44 barnyard perl: nss_ldap: reconnecting to LDAP server 
(sleeping 16 seconds)...
May 17 07:05:00 barnyard perl: nss_ldap: reconnecting to LDAP server 
(sleeping 32 seconds)...
May 17 07:05:32 barnyard perl: nss_ldap: reconnecting to LDAP server 
(sleeping 64 seconds)...
May 17 07:06:36 barnyard perl: nss_ldap: could not search LDAP server - 
Server is unavailable
May 17 07:06:36 barnyard RT: 
<rt-3.6.6-25749-1211033071-977.1533-3-0 at myco.edu> sent  To: 
weiler at soe.ucsc.edu (/usr/local/rt3/lib/RT/Action/SendEmail.pm:297)
May 17 07:06:36 barnyard RT: 
<rt-3.6.6-25749-1211033071-255.1533-4-0 at myco.edu> #1533/14192 - Scrip 4 
  (/usr/local/rt3/lib/RT/Action/SendEmail.pm:266)
May 17 07:06:36 barnyard RT: 
<rt-3.6.6-25749-1211033071-255.1533-4-0 at myco.ucsc.edu> No recipients 
found. Not sending. (/usr/local/rt3/lib/RT/Action/SendEmail.pm:278)
May 17 07:06:36 barnyard RT: Ticket 1533 created in queue 
'Cluser-Admin-Projects' by weiler 
(/usr/local/rt3/lib/RT/Ticket_Overlay.pm:756)

I don't care that the email failed to send because I actually don't want 
any email sent, but it appears to be doing some kind of LDAP lookup or 
something...  LDAP is enabled on this machine and it works fine for 
everything else?  The ticket gets created after some time, but that 
delay while waiting for the LDAP server is annoying...  Anyone seen this 
before?  Or know how to fix it?

Thanks again!

-erich