[rt-users] 3.8.4 installation issue

[Joel Hartshorn]

I had the same issue and found no help.  I did see the offer for "paid"
services, which seems to condradict the idea that you can at least install
the software.

I personally had to crack open each file and examine the failure.  I would
say 99% of the time it is going to be an upline dependency.  IE some perl
module/file on your system is not combatible with 3.8.4.

On RHEL 4.0 I never did get it to work with constant failure on HTML::Mason.

Good luck...and welcome to one of the big downsides of open source.


-----Original Message-----
From: rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Brian Gallew
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 4:44 AM
To: rt Users
Subject: [rt-users] 3.8.4 installation issue

So, I'm installing RT-3.8.4 on a virgin system, for the most part using an
RT_SiteConfig.pm that is very similar to the 3.6.5 system I have in
production (database/hostname differences).  I've run the testdeps/fixdeps
bits repeatedly and they claim I'm up to date.  I've even used the CPAN "r"
command to tell met what to update and then update as much as I can, all to
no avail.  Here is the error I'm getting:

Attempt to reload Apache/Table.pm aborted.
Compilation failed in require at
/home/rt/perl-5.10.0/lib/site_perl/5.10.0/i686-linux/Apache/Request.pm
line 21.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
/home/rt/perl-5.10.0/lib/site_perl/5.10.0/i686-linux/Apache/Request.pm
line 21.
Compilation failed in require at
/home/rt/perl-5.10.0/lib/site_perl/5.10.0/HTML/Mason/ApacheHandler.pm
line 254.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
/home/rt/perl-5.10.0/lib/site_perl/5.10.0/HTML/Mason/ApacheHandler.pm
line 259.
Compilation failed in require at
/home/rt/bin/../lib/RT/Interface/Web/Handler.pm line 140.
Compilation failed in require at (eval 8) line 1.

/usr/www/bin/apachectl startssl: httpd could not be started

I'd tell you this is a Fedora Core 3 system, but that would be misleading as
it's suffered many years worth of modification and changes and therefore
bears no similarity.  Google shows no such error, so I'm wondering if I've
done something egregiously stupid.
_______________________________________________
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support:
sales at bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3359 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/attachments/20090804/9baa959a/attachment.bin>