[rt-users] RT Book : does it worth?

Jesse Vincent jesse at bestpractical.com
Thu Feb 5 12:16:46 EST 2009



> Well, it wasn't meant to sound negative. Just realistic ;-)

No worries. I just want to be clear that we're not intentionally holding
back on docs to sell training :)
> 
> >   I'd love to see it happen -
> > It's just not very high on the priority list...and I'd rather see a new
> > book covering RT4 than RT 3.8.  (http://wiki.bestpractical.com/view/RT4)
> >   
> Can you make an announcement, once you have a version that can be built
> and run to get an idea of what it looks like?
>

The first alphas will really be "look! It compiles! don't use it."

We've started by gutting the internals and leaving the featureset alone. 
After 5+ years, it's something RT really needs. As we get toward beta,
it will be more worth playing with.

-j 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/attachments/20090205/7469b7ed/attachment.sig>


More information about the rt-users mailing list