[rt-users] global default auto-refresh patch for 3.8.2
Kevin Falcone
falcone at bestpractical.com
Fri Feb 13 18:15:04 EST 2009
On Feb 13, 2009, at 6:10 PM, james machado wrote:
> Letting the user change the value of the refresh for themselves is
> not a bad thing but neither is having a non-zero default for the
> entire installation. I very much would have liked to be able to set
> a non-zero default for the page refresh for the installation, the
> options I have seen and tried cause breakage of the system and
> require each user to change the preference each time they login to
> the system. I do agree that undocumented additions and variables
> are bad but it would be very nice if both options were available.
My point was that the installation default should continue to be 0 in
order to be
backwards compatible.
If such a patch were to be produced, I would be happy to consider it
for inclusion
in a future 3.8 release.
-kevin
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Kevin Falcone <falcone at bestpractical.com
> > wrote:
>
> On Feb 12, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Jo Rhett wrote:
>
> >> On Feb 12, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Jo Rhett wrote:
> >>> This patch is adapted from something Ian posted for 3.6.4 adapted
> >>> for 3.8.2. Jesse, please consider adopting this for the
> mainline as
> >>> it is a popular question and this patch allows the person to
> >>> override the default.
> >
> > On Feb 12, 2009, at 12:12 PM, Kevin Falcone wrote:
> >> Since 3.8 added user level preferences, this really looks like
> >> something which is
> >> better handled as a user preference. RT::Config has docs about
> >> adding items
> >> to %META and marking them as user overridable. It would also want
> >> some
> >> changes and docs for RT_Config.pm because you could set a global
> >> default
> >> (default would be 0)
> >
> > Are you saying that you guys will implement it that way for a later
> > version? Or is this a request for a patch to implement these things?
> >
>
> That was a suggestion of how to make the patch better and more
> compatible with 3.8
>
> I wouldn't apply any patch that adds two new Config variables without
> documenting
> them and adding defaults to the shipped config file.
>
> -kevin
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
More information about the rt-users
mailing list