[rt-users] Perl conflicts

[Ram]

> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:47:49 -0500
> From: "ktm at rice.edu" <ktm at rice.edu>
> To: Thomas Sibley <trs at bestpractical.com>
> Cc: rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
> Subject: Re: [rt-users] Perl conflicts
> Message-ID: <20121031174749.GV2872 at aart.rice.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:25:31AM -0700, Thomas Sibley wrote:
>> On 10/31/2012 09:45 AM, Ram wrote:
>> > Any other ideas?
>>
>> It's worlds-apart easier and less error prone to use an entirely
>> separate perl build instead of just a separate perl lib path.  See perlbrew.
>>
>
> +1 It is much, much easier and basically foolproof. Using the separate
> perl lib path is definitely harder to get right and requires more package
> config jiggering. From most to least work:
>
> 1. system perl + CPAN
> 2. RT specific perl + CPAN
> 3. RT specific perl lib path + CPAN + config tweaking
>
> Cheers,
> Ken

Thanks again Ken.
Looks like #2 is the way we're going.
Ram