[rt-users] Problems with Perl modules on CentOS

[Asif Iqbal]

On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Ruslan Zakirov <ruz at bestpractical.com>wrote:

>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Asif Iqbal <vadud3 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Thomas Sibley <trs at bestpractical.com>wrote:
>>
>>> On 06/19/2013 08:26 PM, Johnny Rose Carlsen wrote:
>>> > I have read the wiki about how other people handle RT on CentOS, but I
>>> > can't see any guides who actually solves this problem.
>>>
>>> We recommend using an isolated perl (that is, not the system perl) for
>>> RT.  This keeps RT's deps separate from the system's and ensures neither
>>> break when updates are applied.  This is especially true on CentOS and
>>> RHEL which package certain Perl libraries with features removed, thus
>>> breaking RT.  It's really straightforward to get an isolated perl via
>>>
>>
>>
>> In that context, We are suppose to pick a linux distro for our new RT.
>> Any recommendation?
>>
>
> Dominic does a lot of work to keep .deb packages up to date.
>

That is a good news. Since I was leaning towards precise64.

Thanks


>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>> perlbrew (http://perlbrew.pl) these days, and combined with cpanm
>>> (http://cpanmin.us) you can install the RT deps quickly and easily.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Asif Iqbal
>> PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
>> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
>> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards, Ruslan.
>



-- 
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/attachments/20130622/5f70c91a/attachment.htm>