[rt-users] Faster RT via nginx? (Re: NoAuth CSS redirected ...)
Marc Chantreux
mc at unistra.fr
Thu Oct 2 14:19:50 EDT 2014
hello,
Kevin, you made my day! thank you!
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 11:00:47AM -0400, Kevin Falcone wrote:
> Have you tried the nginx config documented in RT first, before moving
> on to the custom one?
>
> http://bestpractical.com/docs/rt/latest/web_deployment.html#nginx
I have to admit i didn't ... but ... comparing the 2 configs helped me
to catch the problem:
In my file, i wrote:
fastcgi_param SCRIPT_NAME "";
include fastcgi_params;
But fastcgi_params (as provided by debian) set fastcgi_param to
$fastcgi_script_name. this must be overwritten.
include fastcgi_params;
fastcgi_param SCRIPT_NAME "";
works fine!
> However, nginx is not my specialty, so I'm unlikely to be able to help
> debug further.
you did it so well. please note that my version use unix domains sockets
so there is no TCP overhead (it's faster and i do believe it spare
ressources).
also, i use upstream so i can add workers in the row:
upstream acme {
server unix:/tmp/rt.acme.sock.1;
server unix:/tmp/rt.acme.sock.2;
server unix:/tmp/rt.acme.sock.3;
}
however, i don't know if RT can handle more than one server of the
same instance in the same machine. also, i don't know if it could help
to serve more page.
experimenting this is on my todolist but every comment is welcome.
again, thanks for helping
regards
--
Marc Chantreux,
Mes coordonnées: http://annuaire.unistra.fr/chercher?n=chantreux
Direction Informatique, Université de Strasbourg (http://unistra.fr)
Service Métiers, Pôle Outils Collaboratifs
"Don't believe everything you read on the Internet"
-- Abraham Lincoln
More information about the rt-users
mailing list