[SearchBuilder-devel] Re: [PATCH] filters

Jesse Vincent jesse at bestpractical.com
Fri Sep 23 00:35:22 EDT 2005

On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 05:02:22AM +0400, Ruslan Zakirov wrote:
> Comments from Jesse:
> > I see why you moved the filters thing, but it feels a little more wrong to me on records than on columns.
> > and Jifty::DBI::Filterable isn't quite right name
> it's only abstract interface class and it was implemented only to
> reach next goals:
> 1) one interface for all classes where you can define filters
> 2) and cover logic: unless you define own list of the output filters
> we take reversed list of input filters
> I don't know how to name it correctly and also don't like that I've
> created new file for this.

I think it deserves a file. It's a mixin ;)

> Suggest another name for package.


> Also we could move this code into Filter.pm file, but with different
> package name.

Down that road lies madness and SOAP::Lite.

> > also, why the ->{decoded} hash to go along with the fetched hash?
> It's required to optimize code a little, and would help us implement
> any logic we want for load_* methods.

I didn't se it used yet. was it acutally used?

> > also, "wants more docs" ;)
> writing
> > otherwise, nice


More information about the SearchBuilder-devel mailing list