[svk-devel] [PATCH] Verbose commits (includes ? files in commitlog)

[Sartak]

On 6/7/07, Wincent Colaiuta <win at wincent.com> wrote:
> El 7/6/2007, a las 4:06, Sartak escribió:
>
> > On 6/6/07, Sartak <sartak at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 6/6/07, John Peacock <jpeacock at rowman.com> wrote:
> >> > Sartak wrote:
> >> > > Should unversioned directories dump their unversioned contents
> >> into
> >> > > the commit message?
> >> >
> >> > What does 'svk st' display?
> >>
> >> $ find .
> >> .
> >> ./unversioned
> >> ./unversioned/1
> >> $ svk st
> >> ?   unversioned
> >>
> >> > That should be the easiest way to explain this
> >> > feature; in this case, an unversioned directory would display
> >> only the directory
> >> > name itself, and none of the files contained it it.
> >>
> >> Right. My thought was it'd be more convenient for the users to get
> >> the
> >> full recursive behavior. *shrug*
> >>
> >> Shawn M Moore
> >>
> >
> > OK! Here's a real nice patch with all the functionality. And it was
> > made by svk push -P.
> >
> > -v is now the default. If there are any unversioned files, a second
> > header line is added which tells you that you can replace ? with A.
>
> In the end did you decide to recurse, or not to recurse?
>
> I think that consistency with "svk st" is important, so I'm hoping
> you chose not to recurse... :-)
>
> Cheers,
> Wincent

It doesn't recurse. :)

Shawn M Moore