[svk-devel] [PATCH] Verbose commits (includes ? files in commitlog)

Ruslan Zakirov ruz at bestpractical.com
Thu Jun 7 15:22:03 EDT 2007


On 6/7/07, Wincent Colaiuta <win at wincent.com> wrote:
> El 7/6/2007, a las 20:12, John Peacock escribió:
>
> > Sartak wrote:
> >> On 6/7/07, Wincent Colaiuta <win at wincent.com> wrote:
> >>> I think that consistency with "svk st" is important, so I'm hoping
> >>> you chose not to recurse... :-)
> >> It doesn't recurse. :)
> >
> > But, the 'A'dd operation *will* recurse, and then thousands of
> > kittens will die! :0
>
> Yes, but that's consistent with the behaviour of "svk add". I think
> that seeing as it's proposed that this be the default behaviour, then
> consistency with existing svk behaviour should be a high priority.
>
> So, yes I'm arguing for consistency even though it means that if you
> want to do a non-recursive add then you'd have to do it manually
> ("svk add -N") before committing, not from the commit dialog.
Agree. +1, but John's idea with another editor is also cool.

>
> Cheers,
> Wincent
>
> _______________________________________________
> svk-devel mailing list
> svk-devel at bestpractical.com
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/svk-devel
>


-- 
Best regards, Ruslan.


More information about the svk-devel mailing list