[rt-users] More than one database no the same machine?
Jesse Vincent
jesse at bestpractical.com
Wed Oct 17 16:09:17 EDT 2001
I'd recommend running multiple apache instances bound to localhost, with a
passthrough to the "main" apache instance or using hte fastcgi handler.
-j
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 10:01:20PM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I started playing with RT since yesterday, with the intent to support
> two different (for starters) ticket databases and web interfaces. The
> reasons are many, the two strongest being that the two databases
> belong to widely different "domains", and that the web interface will
> be customized differently for each of them.
>
> Looking at the RT installation on my laptop (for testing purposes), it
> looks like the files in rt2/bin and rt2/etc could simply be copied to
> different directories, have the two "use lib" lines in the scripts be
> replaced with whatever is appropriate for each of those directories,
> change each config.pm and I would be set.
>
> Unfortunately, there seems to be a little bit of trouble with
> webmux.pl, or rather, with the fact that Apache can't have different
> (or so it seems when I tested it) PerlRequire for different locations,
> and since webmux.pl has those darned "use lib" lines, I'm stuck with
> one rt2/ root and one only.
>
> A few ideas on how to solve this could be to make webmux.pl sensitive
> to the query path, or to have config.pm contain %DatabaseName instead
> of $DatabaseName (and the same for other variables that depend on the
> database/"domain"), indexed with the query path or parts of the query
> path. The question is how the latter would affect the command rt,
> rtadmin and rt-mailgate.
>
> Comments? Ideas? Has someone already done this, and how?
>
> --
> Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ LeViMS at stacken.kth.se
> Redakteur at Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
> \ SWEDEN \ or +46-733-72 88 11
> Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- poei at bofh.se
> Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
> Software Engineer, GemPlus: http://www.gemplus.com/
>
> Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
> See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
--
http://www.bestpractical.com/products/rt -- Trouble Ticketing. Free.
More information about the rt-users
mailing list