[rt-users] Time in hours
Ken Crocker
KFCrocker at lbl.gov
Fri Nov 18 13:43:49 EST 2005
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHH, that's music to my ears. I have to say that in 2
generations of Data Processing I really feel the RT system is extremely
robust and flexible. I've been working with PeopleSoft for the last 7
years and I've never seen such lazy programming. Their NEW 8.8 doesn't
even bother to alphabatize(sp) the menu listings (so I guess newbies
have to hunt and peck forever until the "LEARN: the system). The RT
authors, on the other hand, really seemed to have tried to do some
common thinking for the users (like pre-filling the Query when going
there from a queue).
Kenn
Jesse Vincent wrote:
>
>On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 10:07:51AM -0800, Ken Crocker wrote:
>
>
>>I don't know about anyone elese, but I've never, in 35 years in this
>>business, heard of keeping track of work in minutes. Even Microsoft
>>Project only goes as low as 1/4 hours. Is there anyway we can get the RT
>>masters to change the time fields to hours and also calculate time
>>estimated minus time worked giving time left? It seems like a small
>>thing but it really would make sense. Just a suggestion (don't want to
>>offend anyone's sensitivities). Thanks.
>>
>>
>
>It's really a mistake that the field granularity isn't in seconds. Do
>note that RT gets used in a lot of scenarios that aren't project
>management. Even scenarios where some of the actors are automated
>agents.
>
>But have a look at RT 3.5, where we give you your choice of minutes and
>hours ;)
>
>Jesse
>
>(FWIW It seems fairly common in the legal profession to bill in increments
>of hundredths of an hour.)
>
>
>
>
>>Kenn
>>KFCrocker at lbl.gov
>>_______________________________________________
>>http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>>
>>Be sure to check out the RT Wiki at http://wiki.bestpractical.com
>>
>>Download a free sample chapter of RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media at
>>http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>>
>>WE'RE COMING TO YOUR TOWN SOON - RT Training in Amsterdam, Boston and
>>San Francisco - Find out more at
>>http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/attachments/20051118/c82e4ab3/attachment.htm>
More information about the rt-users
mailing list