R: [rt-users] Doubts about "Merge into" functionality
Gianluca Cecchi
gcecchi at peviani.it
Fri Dec 14 02:59:52 EST 2007
No, I didn't get any answers.
I presume it is a bug.
Thanks for having come out again.
Perhaps someone ot the more mature users has already set up a fix?
Or are they managing the same issue of reducing redundancy in other more efficient ways?
Gianluca
> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: Chris Poupart [mailto:chris.poupart at mcgill.ca]
> Inviato: giovedì 13 dicembre 2007 16.53
> A: Gianluca Cecchi
> Cc: rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
> Oggetto: Re: [rt-users] Doubts about "Merge into" functionality
>
> I don't know if anyone responded to you or not, but the
> work-around for this problem is to make sure that the tickets
> that you want to merge are in the same queue. That will at
> least take care of queue, I am not sure about custom fields,
> as I haven't double checked that myself.
>
> It is annoying, because we have had situations where owners
> of a ticket that is composed of merged tickets can not see
> all of the details because parts of the merged ticket
> remained in a queue that they didn't have access to.
>
> -- Chris
>
> Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> >
> > Situation:
> >
> > User1 sends an e-mail that creates ticket #1 with subject "I have
> > problem 1" into the queue General
> >
> > I am a master of ticket mgmt, so that in a few seconds I take in
> > charge the ticket, open it, assign to it the queue "hw" and
> CF "company1"
> >
> > After a few minutes User2 sends an e-mail that creates
> ticket #2 with
> > subject "I have problem 1 too" into the queue General
> >
> > I would like to have only one reference for this problem as the two
> > tickets are actually for the same problem 1.
> >
> > I think I have to use the "Mege into" functionality and
> these are the
> > steps I take:
> >
> > 1) from "10 newest unowned tickets" section I click on the subject
> > link for ticket #2
> > 2) select jumbo
> > 3) I go down to "New links" and insert 1 into the section
> "merge into:"
> >
> > But the effect is that
> >
> > A) ticket #2 disappears as it merges into #1 (OK)
> > B) the values of queue and CF for the ticket #1 changes in
> what were
> > the #2 ones (KO)
> >
> > Is it a bug or me incorrectly using the functionality?
> >
> > How would be the correct way to manage this situation?
> > At _http://wiki.bestpractical.com/view/ManualIntroduction_
> i can find
> > explanation only for the other kinds of ticket-links...
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Gianluca
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> >
> > Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support:
> > sales at bestpractical.com
> >
> >
> > Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from
> O'Reilly Media.
> > Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>
More information about the rt-users
mailing list