[rt-users] RT bottlenecks

[Chris Nelson]

What database backend are you using? We noticed a slowdown right around 
10k tickets, and we have a Postgres backend.  One command that we found 
useful was the vacuum command, which increased our performance 
significantly.

Mathew wrote:
> I've been informed that some are beginning to complain about the speed
> of RT when it comes to loading tickets that contain attachments.  This
> has led to the question of distributed computing in the way of load
> balancing.  I'd like to avoid moving in this direction with RT as we
> don't have the need for it.  Our user base is small as is our ticket count.
>
> It would seem that most of the bottleneck comes from actually loading
> the page.  I've found that tickets with numerous transactions (exact
> number not known) tend to be slow to load even without attachments.
>
> How should I go about pinpointing the bottleneck so I can find a
> solution that won't require a major tech refresh?
>
>
> Mathew
>   

-- 
Chris Nelson
CDA Unix Administrator
NightHawk Radiology Services
250 Northwest Blvd. #206
Coeur D'Alene, ID 83814

208.415.0588 (Office)
509.294.1835 (Cell)
208.664.2720 (Fax)
cnelson at nighthawkrad.net (email)
http://www.nighthawkrad.net (Web)

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:   This email, including any attachments, contains information from NightHawk Radiology Services, which may be confidential or privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify NightHawk Radiology Services immediately by forwarding message to support at nighthawkrad.net and destroy all electronic and hard copies of the communication, including attachments.