[rt-users] Question on CommandByMail error
Kevin Falcone
falcone at bestpractical.com
Fri Nov 12 12:32:09 EST 2010
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:27:16AM -0800, Kenneth Crocker wrote:
> Are you saying the format I use for the date itself is wrong?
Yes. Your format is wrong.
I believe I've said that in each reply (I've snipped them below)
-kevin
> > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Kevin Falcone <[1][2]falcone at bestpractical.com> wrote:
> > This is not a Timestamp, it is a Date. A Timestamp includes a Time.
> > > On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 01:22:51PM -0800, Kenneth Crocker wrote:
> > > A timestamp is a timestamp, what RT displays dates as by default.
> > > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Kevin Falcone <[1][3][3][4]falcone at bestpractical.com>
> > > > > I tried this several times, ie. Due:11-26-2010; Due: 2010-11-28; Due: 11-26-2010,
> > > > The test suite passes using a timestamp (which is what the
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/attachments/20101112/a4b3ee3e/attachment.sig>
More information about the rt-users
mailing list