[rt-users] Question on CommandByMail error

[Kenneth Crocker]

Kevin,

I'm sorry. I know I'm hard to deal with. We don't use timestamp on any of
our dates. We just use dates. Our global system default is time=>0 in our
date format:
*Set($DateTimeFormat, {Format => 'LocalizedDate', Time => 0,});

*So when we want to set a date, we just want the date, hence "Due:
2010-11-15".
However, if you're saying the format of the date itself (2010-11-15) is
wrong, then I am wondering what it should be since our "LocalizedDate"
format is yyyy-mm-dd.

Is that a clearer explanation of where I'm coming from?

Kenn
LBNL
*
*
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Kevin Falcone <falcone at bestpractical.com>wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:27:16AM -0800, Kenneth Crocker wrote:
> >    Are you saying the format I use for the date itself is wrong?
>
> Yes.  Your format is wrong.
>
> I believe I've said that in each reply (I've snipped them below)
>
> -kevin
>
> >      > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Kevin Falcone <[1][2]
> falcone at bestpractical.com> wrote:
> >      > This is not a Timestamp, it is a Date. A Timestamp includes a
> Time.
>
>
> >      > > On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 01:22:51PM -0800, Kenneth Crocker wrote:
> >      > > A timestamp is a timestamp, what RT displays dates as by
> default.
>
> >      > > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Kevin Falcone <[1][3][3][4]
> falcone at bestpractical.com>
> >      > > > > I tried this several times, ie. Due:11-26-2010; Due:
> 2010-11-28; Due: 11-26-2010,
> >      > > > The test suite passes using a timestamp (which is what the
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/attachments/20101112/ed8424d6/attachment.htm>