[rt-users] Why use CFs on transations vs. tickets

Kevin Falcone falcone at bestpractical.com
Fri Jun 15 20:18:40 EDT 2012

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:17:56PM +0400, Ruslan Zakirov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Jaime Kikpole <jkikpole at cairodurham.org> wrote:
> > Am I missing something?  Is there a way to use CFs on the
> I don't have an example that makes TxnCFs shine for real.

I'm aware of people using it to track a bunch of billing info, because
there might be multiple billable transactions in a ticket so tracking
it at the ticket level is wrong.

> > Is there away to search based on the contents of CFs that are on a
> > transaction level?
> I believe there is a branch for this in the repo.

There is, we're planning to make it available in 4.2

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/attachments/20120615/12154224/attachment.sig>

More information about the rt-users mailing list