[rt-users] Upgrade RT, what about plugin module?

[Ruslan Zakirov]

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Thomas Lau <Thomas.Lau at principleone.com>wrote:

>  Hi, Thanks for replying.****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Does it means basically no extra step should do on plugin during minor
> version upgrade?
>

Shouldn't be. Create a dev environment where you can play with things and
you will be more confident.


> ****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* ruslan.zakirov at gmail.com [mailto:ruslan.zakirov at gmail.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Ruslan Zakirov
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 23, 2013 1:27 PM
> *To:* Thomas Lau
> *Cc:* rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
> *Subject:* Re: [rt-users] Upgrade RT, what about plugin module?****
>
> ** **
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 5:15 AM, Thomas Lau <Thomas.Lau at principleone.com>
> wrote:****
>
>  Hi,****
>
>  ****
>
> I am wondering if plugin would have problem if I perform general minor
> version upgrade on 4.0.x?****
>
>  ** **
>
> They shouldn't. We work hard not to break backwards compatibility in minor
> versions and avoid database changes as much as possible.****
>
>  ****
>
>   ****
>
> Recently we intensively use more and more plugin which I am not sure if it
> will drive the upgrade more complicated.****
>
>  ****
>
> We are using RT-Extension-CommandByMail, RT-Extension-RepeatTicket and
> RT-Extension-SLA.****
>
>  ** **
>
> All these should work with recent versions of 4.0.x.****
>
>  ****
>
>
>
>
> --
> RT Training in Seattle, June 19-20: http://bestpractical.com/training****
>
>
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> --
> Best regards, Ruslan. ****
>
>
>
> --
> RT Training in Seattle, June 19-20: http://bestpractical.com/training
>



-- 
Best regards, Ruslan.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/attachments/20130523/5c6b802e/attachment.htm>